A detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool for your workflow.
| Feature | Cursor Editor The AI-First Code Editor Built for Speed & Efficiency | Windsurf AI-powered code editor with deep codebase understanding and agentic flows |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.3(7) | |
| Pricing | Freemium SubscriptionFree Tier Free tier; paid from $20/month. AI inline code gen and context-aware edits. | Freemium |
| Category | AI Code Editors | AI Code Editors |
| Use Case | Coding | Coding |
| Has API | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Open Source | ||
| SSO Support | ||
| Trains on Your Data | ||
| Team Size | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud Only | Cloud Only |
| Time to Value | Hours | Minutes |
| Best For | — | Professional software developers, engineering teams |
| Verified |
Based on community ratings, Cursor Editor (4.3/5 from 7 reviews) has the edge over Windsurf (4.0/5 from 1 reviews). That said, the difference is slim and both tools are well regarded.
Pricing: Both tools are freemium options. Check the pricing tiers above to find the best value for your needs.
Key differences: Cursor Editor stands out for developer-friendly with api access..
Bottom line: Both tools serve the Coding use case. Cursor Editor is the safer pick based on community data, but Windsurf may suit your workflow better.
Cursor Editor has a higher community rating (4.3 vs 4.0) based on 8 total reviews on AIPowerStacks. However, "better" depends on your specific use case, budget, and team size.
While both tools serve similar purposes, many users run both during a trial period before committing. If budget allows, using both gives you redundancy and lets you pick the right tool for each task.
Both tools have similar pricing models. Use our pricing comparison above to see exact tier-by-tier costs.