Make (Integromat) vs n8n
A detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool for your workflow.
| Feature | Make (Integromat) Visual automation platform connecting 1500+ apps | n8n Open-source workflow automation with AI capabilities |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5(6789) | |
| Pricing | Freemium Free tier, Core $9/mo, Pro $16/mo | Freemium Free (self-hosted), Cloud from $20/mo |
| Category | Automation | Automation |
| Use Case | Workflow AutomationApp IntegrationMulti-Step Automation | Workflow AutomationApp Integration |
| Has API | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Open Source | ||
| SSO Support | ||
| Trains on Your Data | ||
| Team Size | — | — |
| Deployment | — | — |
| Time to Value | — | — |
| Best For | — | — |
| Verified |
Make (Integromat) vs n8n: Which Should You Choose?
Based on community ratings, Make (Integromat) (4.5/5 from 6789 reviews) has the edge over n8n (4.6/5 from 4567 reviews). That said, the difference is slim and both tools are well regarded.
Pricing: Both tools are freemium options. Check the pricing tiers above to find the best value for your needs.
Bottom line: Both tools serve the Automation use case. Make (Integromat) is the safer pick based on community data, but n8n may suit your workflow better.
Is Make (Integromat) better than n8n?
n8n has a higher community rating (4.6 vs 4.5) based on 11356 total reviews on AIPowerStacks. However, "better" depends on your specific use case, budget, and team size.
Can I use Make (Integromat) and n8n together?
While both tools serve similar purposes, many users run both during a trial period before committing. If budget allows, using both gives you redundancy and lets you pick the right tool for each task.
Which is cheaper, Make (Integromat) or n8n?
Both tools have similar pricing models. Use our pricing comparison above to see exact tier-by-tier costs.