A detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool for your workflow.
| Feature | Gemini 3.1 Ultra Google's 2M-token multimodal model across text, image, audio, and video | Claude Opus 4.7 87.6% SWE-bench — the strongest coding model available |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5(1567) | |
| Pricing | Freemium Free via Google AI Studio, Advanced $20/mo, API $2/$12 per 1M tokens | Freemium Free tier, Pro $20/mo, Max $100-200/mo, API $5/$25 per 1M tokens |
| Category | AI Chat & Assistants | AI Chat & Assistants |
| Use Case | Research | Coding |
| Has API | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Open Source | ||
| SSO Support | ||
| Trains on Your Data | ||
| Team Size | — | — |
| Deployment | — | — |
| Time to Value | — | — |
| Best For | — | — |
| Verified |
Based on community ratings, Claude Opus 4.7 (4.8/5 from 1890 reviews) has the edge over Gemini 3.1 Ultra (4.5/5 from 1567 reviews). That said, the difference is slim and both tools are well regarded.
Pricing: Both tools are freemium options. Check the pricing tiers above to find the best value for your needs.
Bottom line: Gemini 3.1 Ultra is built for Research, while Claude Opus 4.7 targets Coding. If you need both, Claude Opus 4.7 has the stronger community signal.
Claude Opus 4.7 has a higher community rating (4.8 vs 4.5) based on 3457 total reviews on AIPowerStacks. However, "better" depends on your specific use case, budget, and team size.
Yes. Since Gemini 3.1 Ultra focuses on Research and Claude Opus 4.7 on Coding, they can complement each other in your workflow.
Both tools have similar pricing models. Use our pricing comparison above to see exact tier-by-tier costs.